Self-Plagiarism and Types of Plagiarism: What Journals Flag

Peer review, acceptance & rejection guides › Self-Plagiarism and Types of Plagiarism

Quick answer. Self-plagiarism is reusing your own published text, data or figures without citing the earlier work, or publishing the same study twice. Journals check every submission with similarity software such as iThenticate (Crossref Similarity Check), and a high overlap with earlier papers, including your own, can lead to desk rejection.

Types of plagiarism journals look for

TypeWhat it isHow journals see it
Direct (verbatim)Copying text word for word without quotation marks and citationSerious misconduct
Mosaic (patchwork)Mixing copied phrases with your own wordsUsually detected by similarity software
Paraphrasing without citationRewording someone’s ideas without crediting themPlagiarism even though the words differ
Self-plagiarism (text recycling)Reusing your own published text without citing itOften flagged; acceptable limits depend on the journal
Duplicate publicationPublishing the same study in two journalsSerious misconduct; leads to retraction
Salami slicingSplitting one study into several thin papersQuestioned by editors and reviewers
Image and data reuseReusing figures or data from earlier papers without saying soIncreasingly checked with image tools
(a) Your 2023 paperPublished(b) New submissionSubmittedmethodsresults(c) Similarity reportoverlap with own workmethods, cited: often fineresults reused: flaggedoriginal textHighlighted lines appear in both papers.
Figure 1. (a) An earlier paper and (b) a new submission with the same passages highlighted; (c) the similarity report that flags the overlap.

What journals said in decisions shared on ScholarsColab

Similarity or plagiarism came up in 4 of the 661 reviewer comments and decisions shared anonymously by researchers (updated 18 October 2026), including 2 rejection letters.

“Submission Returned to Author because paper was found similar to an already published article during the Crossref Similarity Check (plagiarism issue).”
“The main deficiency in the paper is as follows: Overall Similarity Index Percentage:39% which is much higher than the journal standard, 20% for the 1st screen.”
“In reviewing your manuscript, I discovered that there are sections which seem to be unoriginal, having appeared in previously published work(s).”
“The manuscript still contains some plagiarised content.”

How to avoid self-plagiarism

  • Cite your earlier papers whenever you reuse methods, data or ideas from them.
  • Rephrase reused method descriptions and cite the original, or check whether the journal allows standard method text to be reused.
  • Disclose related submissions or preprints in the cover letter.
  • Ask for permission before reusing published figures, even your own.
  • Check similarity before submitting. A pre-submission audit with a similarity report shows overlaps while they are easy to fix.

Received reviewer comments yourself? Share them anonymously to make this data more useful for everyone.

Frequently asked questions

What is self-plagiarism?

Self-plagiarism is reusing your own published text, data or figures without citing the earlier publication, or publishing the same work twice. Journals treat it as a breach of publication ethics.

How much similarity is acceptable in a journal submission?

There is no universal threshold. Editors read the similarity report rather than only the percentage: overlap in references or standard method phrases is usually fine, while copied results, discussion or text from your own earlier papers is not.

Is reusing my own methods section plagiarism?

Some journals accept limited reuse of standard method descriptions if the earlier paper is cited; others expect it to be rephrased. Check the journal’s policy and always cite the source.

Can a paper be rejected for self-plagiarism?

Yes. High overlap with the authors’ earlier publications is a common reason for desk rejection, and duplicate publication can lead to retraction after publication.

More peer review and publishing guides

About the data on this page. Figures and quotes come from reviewer comments and editor decisions that researchers shared anonymously on ScholarsColab; names, titles and identifiers are removed. They describe the experiences shared here, not every journal.